ASTRO-sciences

A New Method and Philosophy of Astro-sciences, from Astrology to Astronomy and more

I think the biggest departure from the post-modern zeitgeist, would be my position on Astrology being in error through its assumption of the Zodiac's importance. This is why the Society goes around with a Sun Sign mentality. First of all, astrology is using the Tropical Zodiac, which has positions out-of-date. Astronomy uses the Sidereal Zodiac. But this is not the most significant factor of the error. I have reconciled the Tropical Sidereal dichotomy (and it's not exactly as one would assume). In fact, the most significant factor actually is the larger influence of the house positions and the planets themselves in aspects.

In other words, the predominant concepts (and corrections) I am bringing to Astrology (and Astronomy) is the ranking of its fundamental components. I am demoting the Zodiac signs, while I am promoting the other components. Number one should be planetary placement in House position. Number two should be planetary aspects. number three should be Zodiac placement of planets and house cusps. But the Zodiac needs to be handled differently, with a new grasp of what it is and its influence, Tropical vs. Sidereal.